WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en

00:00:00.160 --> 00:00:05.106
Hello and welcome to the part where I skip&nbsp;
the part at the beginning because I can’t be bothered.

00:00:05.106 --> 00:00:09.105
Did you hear about the time the&nbsp;hotel hosted an architecture convention?

00:00:09.776 --> 00:00:11.772
They put up a bunch of ceiling fans.

00:00:11.772 --> 00:00:13.414
And speaking&nbsp;of ceiling fans,

00:00:13.414 --> 00:00:16.918
I don’t know about you but whenever I’m looking at a ceiling fan,

00:00:16.918 --> 00:00:19.352
this is&nbsp;all I can think of.

00:00:19.352 --> 00:00:27.656
And if an airplane propeller can push air backwards so hard that it generates&nbsp;enough thrust to make the airplane it’s attached to fly,

00:00:27.656 --> 00:00:32.305
well then surely a ceiling fan is&nbsp;producing at least a bit of thrust, right?

00:00:32.305 --> 00:00:35.385
Mmmmaybe an airplane wasn’t the best comparison,

00:00:35.385 --> 00:00:37.012
what about this?

00:00:37.012 --> 00:00:44.739
I mean what is a helicopter but a big ceiling fan
with a little cabin hanging off&nbsp;the bottom of it that you can go inside of?

00:00:44.739 --> 00:00:50.674
And somehow that ceiling fan is blowing enough air&nbsp;
down at the ground to make the thing fly!

00:00:50.674 --> 00:00:53.575
And then it’s got that little fan on the back, too&nbsp;- fun fact,

00:00:53.575 --> 00:01:01.814
the reason that’s there is because a single-rotor helicopter has a big spinny thing on&nbsp;top of it which is constantly producing a twisting torque which,

00:01:01.814 --> 00:01:05.313
since the thing just floats in&nbsp;the air and isn’t attached to anything else,

00:01:05.313 --> 00:01:10.468
would spin the body of the helicopter around real&nbsp;
fast and that would make it very difficult to fly,

00:01:10.468 --> 00:01:18.057
so the tail rotor is just a second sideways fan
blowing in the opposite direction that the big rotor is trying to twist the cabin

00:01:18.057 --> 00:01:22.376
to keep&nbsp;the helicopter from spinning out of control which makes it much easier to fly.

00:01:22.376 --> 00:01:29.434
Dual-rotor&nbsp;helicopters don’t need that so long as the rotors are spinning in opposite directions&nbsp;to cancel each other’s twisting torque out.

00:01:29.434 --> 00:01:37.463
But anyway this video is about ceiling fans&nbsp;
and I wanted to find out how much thrust a typical ceiling fan produces.

00:01:37.463 --> 00:01:43.608
Because it’s got&nbsp;to be more than zero -
it’s the same thing as a helicopter rotor or an airplane propeller

00:01:43.608 --> 00:01:48.282
but hanging from a ceiling to keep you cool rather than power human flight.

00:01:48.282 --> 00:01:54.431
So I bought&nbsp;this cheap ceiling fan from Menards
and set about finding a way to weigh it while it’s in&nbsp;operation.

00:01:54.431 --> 00:02:01.691
And when I floated this idea to my friend Dan “Spiffy” Neuman, 
who happens to be the&nbsp;world’s premier source of ceiling fan knowledge,

00:02:01.691 --> 00:02:06.250
I was immediately chastised for not having&nbsp;something better to run this test with.

00:02:06.250 --> 00:02:12.516
I brought this idea up to Dan because, initially,&nbsp;I was struggling 
to figure out a way to safely test this.

00:02:12.516 --> 00:02:18.039
I was envisioning using rope or chain&nbsp;and hanging the fan from some kind of scale

00:02:18.039 --> 00:02:24.497
but I couldn’t see how the fan wouldn’t get wildly out&nbsp;of control
without some sort of sturdier solution.

00:02:24.497 --> 00:02:29.920
And luckily, during a visit to my office where Dan&nbsp;
delivered several fans for testing and more,

00:02:29.920 --> 00:02:37.966
we cobbled together various stuffs lying around the&nbsp;
warehouse and assembled this completely safe and not at all sketchy test rig,

00:02:37.966 --> 00:02:43.132
complete with a crane&nbsp;scale which can measure the weight with fairly high precision.

00:02:43.132 --> 00:02:47.481
The filing cabinets are just&nbsp;to get the fan a little higher off the ground.

00:02:47.481 --> 00:02:56.200
Now, when a ceiling fan is operating and&nbsp;blowing air downward,
that should mean the fan itself gets at least a little lighter.

00:02:56.200 --> 00:03:02.307
Some&nbsp;scientist guy said something about
every action causing an equal and opposite reaction&nbsp;and,

00:03:02.307 --> 00:03:08.281
well, if it’s pushing air down, then the air must be pushing the fan up.

00:03:08.281 --> 00:03:10.064
But&nbsp;does it?

00:03:10.064 --> 00:03:15.250
Well, the cheap Menards fan weighs, according to the scale, 11.5 pounds.

00:03:15.250 --> 00:03:17.618
That’s a&nbsp;different number in kilograms.

00:03:17.618 --> 00:03:20.513
And, once it’s up to speed the scale reads…

00:03:20.513 --> 00:03:22.822
11.2 pounds.

00:03:22.822 --> 00:03:27.900
So it&nbsp;got three tenths of a pound lighter, or 136 grams.

00:03:27.900 --> 00:03:29.876
But not so fast!

00:03:29.876 --> 00:03:36.412
Keen-eyed viewers may have&nbsp;noticed
that the scale jumped up slightly once the fan started.

00:03:36.412 --> 00:03:42.715
The twisting force it was creating&nbsp;on the scale
did skew the number a bit and if we take that into account,

00:03:42.715 --> 00:03:44.850
well things change a&nbsp;bit.

00:03:44.850 --> 00:03:49.654
When first switched on the fan appeared to gain 0.14 pounds.

00:03:49.654 --> 00:03:53.601
And when I unplugged it and&nbsp;the twisting force from the motor was alleviated,

00:03:53.601 --> 00:04:01.099
the scale briefly read 11.02 pounds so the&nbsp;fan appeared to lose 0.18.

00:04:01.099 --> 00:04:10.990
If we split the difference and add 0.16 pounds of thrust,
then the&nbsp;fan actually got .46 pounds lighter, or 209 grams.

00:04:10.990 --> 00:04:16.351
But remember, this is a cheap fan from Menards&nbsp;which is weak and cheap.

00:04:16.351 --> 00:04:22.844
This is an Envirofan Gold Line and I’ve been assured that this is a&nbsp;good fan.

00:04:22.844 --> 00:04:26.742
It’s certainly a lot heftier coming in at some 20.32 pounds

00:04:26.742 --> 00:04:29.041
which is a different&nbsp;number in kilograms.

00:04:29.041 --> 00:04:32.603
And how much does it weigh once it’s up to speed?

00:04:32.603 --> 00:04:40.185
Well we have the&nbsp;same torque issue happening which appears to increase the weight but once it’s up to&nbsp;its rather terrifying top speed

00:04:40.185 --> 00:04:46.746
the scale stabilized at 19.35 pounds,
almost an even&nbsp;pound of thrust.

00:04:46.746 --> 00:04:57.763
Upon power removal the scale briefly read 19.22 pounds so if I split the&nbsp;difference in noise between the added weight at start-up and the added thrust at power-down

00:04:57.763 --> 00:05:03.356
the fan lost 1.035 pounds of weight, about 470 grams.

00:05:03.356 --> 00:05:09.112
And that’s 4.6 newtons of thrust
for those&nbsp;who prefer figures expressed in fig cookie bars.

00:05:09.200 --> 00:05:12.217
But many ceiling fans are reversible.

00:05:12.217 --> 00:05:20.720
The&nbsp;general idea there is that if you have the fan running backwards it’s blowing up into the&nbsp;ceiling which produces less of a noticeable draft&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:05:20.720 --> 00:05:24.193
but still moves air around the room to reduce&nbsp;temperature gradients,

00:05:24.193 --> 00:05:33.304
particularly useful in the winter when the effect of warmer air rising&nbsp;
can get heat stuck up against the ceiling where&nbsp;it’s not helpful.

00:05:33.304 --> 00:05:36.843
Would a fan running in reverse&nbsp;get heavier, then?

00:05:36.843 --> 00:05:41.455
Well, I reversed the Gold Line fan to find out and the answer is…

00:05:41.455 --> 00:05:42.530
yes!

00:05:42.530 --> 00:05:49.061
The fan&nbsp;went from an initial 21.07 pounds to 21.86 pounds.

00:05:49.061 --> 00:05:54.235
The different initial number has to do with&nbsp;
the taring weirdness of this particular scale.

00:05:54.235 --> 00:06:04.155
This time I didn’t see any weird weight changes&nbsp;from torque so I’ll just go ahead and say that the fan got 0.79 pounds heavier when running&nbsp;at full-speed in reverse.

00:06:04.155 --> 00:06:06.730
That’s 358 grams.

00:06:06.730 --> 00:06:11.302
Oh, and speaking of heat recovery, here’s another&nbsp;fan to test!

00:06:11.302 --> 00:06:20.459
This is an Emerson Heat Fan - a commercial fan designed for buildings with high&nbsp;ceilings to push the warm air collecting against the ceiling back down

00:06:20.459 --> 00:06:25.898
so people on the floor&nbsp;can feel all that warmth
and the heat doesn’t have to run so much.

00:06:25.898 --> 00:06:30.593
This was a product of the&nbsp;energy crisis of the seventies,
and someone at Emerson realized

00:06:30.593 --> 00:06:33.034
“hey, we make motors.

00:06:33.034 --> 00:06:39.591
Why not&nbsp;take one of our washing machine motor housings, 
stick some fan blades on there, and sell it as&nbsp;a heat recovery fan?”

00:06:39.591 --> 00:06:42.184
and, well, that’s what this is.

00:06:42.184 --> 00:06:47.375
And because it’s got a big ol’ motor&nbsp;powering the thing, it can move a lot of air.

00:06:47.375 --> 00:06:50.706
So how much thrust does it generate?

00:06:50.706 --> 00:06:58.561
Well, we had&nbsp;an initial reading of 24.24 pounds, 
and this time the torque generated by the motor didn’t seem to&nbsp;matter.

00:06:58.561 --> 00:07:05.264
and by the time the fan had hit top speed the lightest reading seen was 22.88 pounds.

00:07:05.264 --> 00:07:11.853
Ah,&nbsp;except when the fan had come to a stop the scale now read 23.85 pounds.

00:07:11.853 --> 00:07:15.886
I tried my best here to&nbsp;make sure the power supply cord wasn’t pulling on the fan

00:07:15.886 --> 00:07:22.963
but there was some wobbling around so it’s&nbsp;
possible the cord did influence the scale by half a pound or so,

00:07:22.963 --> 00:07:26.696
but it’s also possible that the&nbsp;scale was just being wonky.

00:07:26.696 --> 00:07:30.311
It has some internal logic which makes the reading a little weird:

00:07:30.311 --> 00:07:37.823
I would have loved to have tared it at zero and then done the test but it would just stay&nbsp;at zero even once the fan was at full speed

00:07:37.823 --> 00:07:42.352
so the only way to get any sort of reading was to do&nbsp;subtraction.

00:07:42.352 --> 00:07:51.096
Regardless, this fan either produced a similar 1 pound of thrust or,
if we’re feeling&nbsp;generous, it produced 1.36 pounds of thrust.

00:07:51.096 --> 00:08:00.185
But speaking of heat fans, here's a very weird&nbsp;
home ceiling fan from the ‘80s with a built in electric heater.

00:08:00.185 --> 00:08:03.806
I will probably make a video&nbsp;about this fan specifically one day -

00:08:03.806 --> 00:08:10.864
it’s an interesting concept but runs up against some&nbsp;
rather fundamental problems and was also executed…

00:08:10.864 --> 00:08:15.755
strangely but for now I just want to see how much&nbsp;thrust it produces.

00:08:15.755 --> 00:08:25.660
I didn’t have a great way to hang this guy - its mounting hardware didn’t quite&nbsp;work with a standard hook, at least not easily, so I just hung it from some rope which…

00:08:25.660 --> 00:08:27.237
worked.

00:08:27.237 --> 00:08:29.440
But, Dan, look away for a moment.

00:08:30.040 --> 00:08:33.910
This sucker’s heavy, coming in at 32.62 pounds,

00:08:33.910 --> 00:08:36.353
which is a different number in kilograms.

00:08:36.353 --> 00:08:37.839
And…

00:08:37.839 --> 00:08:44.082
once that disaster was over the scale stabilized&nbsp;at 31.91 pounds.

00:08:44.082 --> 00:08:47.852
I even checked the wiring this time to make sure it wasn’t taught.

00:08:47.852 --> 00:08:56.274
The scale&nbsp;read the same 32.62 pounds once it had come to a stop so this fan apparently&nbsp;generates about 7/10ths of a pound of thrust,

00:08:56.274 --> 00:09:02.598
which is 322 grams of weight&nbsp;reduction or 3.16 fig Newtons of force.

00:09:02.598 --> 00:09:04.336
So, there we have it.

00:09:04.336 --> 00:09:12.151
Ceiling fans apparently&nbsp;produce somewhere between half a pound and a full pound of thrust depending on how good of a&nbsp;fan it is.

00:09:12.151 --> 00:09:20.918
Surely some fans produce more and some produce less - 
those big high-velocity low-speed&nbsp;fans which are starting to spread all over the place

00:09:20.918 --> 00:09:29.795
undoubtedly generate more thrust than these,&nbsp;
and I’m sure there are crappier fans than this one out there which produce even less.

00:09:29.795 --> 00:09:34.424
But to be honest,&nbsp;the reason I was curious about this is because

00:09:34.424 --> 00:09:42.799
I’ve always been a little concerned with the&nbsp;forces that a typical ceiling fan produces on the electrical box it’s mounted to

00:09:42.799 --> 00:09:46.737
and I wanted&nbsp;to have a better understanding of those forces.

00:09:46.737 --> 00:09:56.244
Clearly these tests show that the reduction or&nbsp;
addition of weight caused by thrust generated by the fan is pretty insignificant -

00:09:56.244 --> 00:10:03.281
the torque&nbsp;the fan produces on the box as the motor spins
is undoubtedly much more noteworthy,

00:10:03.281 --> 00:10:07.152
especially when we consider the jerk force at startup.

00:10:07.152 --> 00:10:17.993
But I am glad to know that there is&nbsp;actually a measurable decrease in weight
when you run a ceiling fan on high… at least forward.

00:10:17.993 --> 00:10:20.253
Was there really any reason to know that?

00:10:20.253 --> 00:10:24.678
No, but now we do, and at least I got a video out&nbsp;of it.

00:10:24.678 --> 00:10:29.032
And I don’t want to hear anything about the effort involved here -

00:10:29.032 --> 00:10:39.181
I did zero&nbsp;research other than double check what HVLS stood for and relied on Dan
for all the&nbsp;fantastic fun fan facts which were peppered in here and there

00:10:39.181 --> 00:10:41.598
and also for three of the&nbsp;fans.

00:10:41.598 --> 00:10:47.636
And thanks to Dan the Fan Man, oh boy is the next video gonna be great.

00:10:47.636 --> 00:10:49.814
Christmas time&nbsp;this year’s gonna be better than ever.

00:10:50.927 --> 00:10:51.712
Kay bye.

00:10:52.454 --> 00:10:55.134
♫ propulsively smooth jazz ♫

00:10:57.041 --> 00:11:00.509
Hello and welcome… zzhhzh what the&nbsp;why does that keep happening?

00:11:01.710 --> 00:11:04.704
…doubtedly much more noteworthy, especially&nbsp;when you con—

00:11:06.311 --> 00:11:07.854
I dunno what happened there.

00:11:07.854 --> 00:11:12.853
I mean what is a helicopter but a big&nbsp;ceiling fan with a little hh…

00:11:14.337 --> 00:11:15.596
eughhh

00:11:15.596 --> 00:11:19.331
…every action causing an equal and&nbsp;opposhit re -- oof.

00:11:19.331 --> 00:11:20.770
Well, lost that one.

00:11:20.770 --> 00:11:25.579
And if we take that into account
there’s&nbsp;a lot of road noise so I will back up and restart.

00:11:25.579 --> 00:11:27.391
But not so fast!

00:11:27.391 --> 00:11:28.990
But once it’s up to speed…

00:11:28.990 --> 00:11:29.717
ahhhhh,

00:11:29.717 --> 00:11:31.714
ahhhhh!!!
[an octave higher]

00:11:31.714 --> 00:11:33.230
♫ over the rainbow ♫

00:11:33.230 --> 00:11:37.609
I relied on Dan for all the
fantastic fun fan facts which were peppered&nbsp;in here and there

00:11:37.609 --> 00:11:40.501
and for ff ff f f f f ff f

